MeridianConsensus

Strategic intelligence for decision-makers,
on any market, any geography.

Not a research report. A strategic intelligence platform: search any market to open a 30-to-75-chapter study, audit every claim against the underlying sources, or commission new intelligence on demand, all tracked from a live workspace built for boardroom-grade decision-making.

Role-tested

Insights for every role.

Nine workflows we built the product around. Each gets the depth they need, the analyst running diligence, the CFO building the model, the CEO walking to the board.

The product · live

Not a PDF, an interactive dashboard.

Every commissioned study ships as a working dashboard: tab-switchable views across size, competition, regions and segmentation, hoverable bars, live KPIs, and a committee-signed audit trail on every figure. The specimen below is a taste; real reports go deeper.

Interactive dashboard · live
Electric-vehicle batteries · specimen
MRI · Q2 2026
Overview
2025 size · 2026–2036 forecast · committee-signed
$45B (COVID baseline)
2019
$54B
2020
$66B
2021
$80B
2022
$97B
2023
$118B
2024
$142B
2025
$370B forecast
2030
$980B forecast
2036
Revenue trajectory (historical 2020 – Q1 2026 · forecast 2026–2036)
Headline figures
2025 size
$142.3B
2036 forecast
$980B +21.4% CAGR
Confidence
High
See a live report
Live across Meridian

How we work.

Five phases. One proprietary methodology. Every figure committee-reviewed before access, and every thesis dated for full traceability.

Step 01
Instant

Frame

Define the strategic question. Set the boundary, what is in scope, what is adjacent, what is out. Every downstream figure traces to this definition.

  • Strategic scope
  • Definition memo
  • Adjacent-market map
Step 02
Parallel

Intelligence

Synthesize the evidence base. Institutional archives, proprietary datasets, and independent reconciliation converge into a unified picture.

  • Evidence base
  • Independent reconciliation
  • Proprietary datasets
Step 03
Parallel

Stress-test

Every figure pressure-tested against multiple independent lenses. Ensemble scoring surfaces disagreements before they surface in your boardroom.

  • Ensemble score
  • Variance bands
  • Flags surfaced
Step 04
On-demand

Committee

Adversarial review by the research committee. Plausibility, internal consistency, and thesis quality each receive sign-off before anything publishes.

  • Committee sign-off
  • Thesis validation
  • Research review
Step 05
Instant

Access

Commissioned output is accessible instantly. Quarterly refresh cadence with event-triggered revisions. Every diff disclosed against the prior thesis.

  • Commissioned report
  • Quarterly refresh
  • Revision log
Access
Instant
On demand · vs 6–8 weeks at independent analyst benchmarks
Cadence
Quarterly
Refresh + event-triggered revisions
Coverage

Any market.
Any geography.

Meridian commissions research on any market in the world, in any industry, with the same methodology and the same committee review. The sectors below are representative verticals where commissioned studies are already in the library; coverage is not limited to them.

Don’t see your market?

Meridian commissions research on any market in any industry, in any geography. The sectors above are representative, not a ceiling. If your vertical is not listed, it can still be commissioned under the same methodology.

Commission any market
Capabilities

Capabilities, not slogans.

Four canonical engagement archetypes, disclosed by approach, deliverables, and what you walk away with. Specific past references are held under NDA; the methodology is not. Reference engagements available under mutual confidentiality.

Archetypes shown
4
Representative, not exhaustive
Sectors fitted
4
Cyber · Health · Mobility · Digital-infra
Typical depth
30 ch
Per commissioned study
Typical access
3–10 days
Bespoke; retainers are ongoing
01
Archetype 01 · Bottom-up sizing + vendor positioning

M&A Opportunity Sizing

OT/ICS · software · infrastructure verticals

5–7 d
End-to-end delivery
Duration
5–7 calendar days, end-to-end
Team
1 lead analyst · 1 red-team reviewer · committee sign-off
When it fits

An M&A evaluation in flight, where the buyer needs a defensible view of opportunity landscape, revenue-pool decomposition, vendor positioning, and independent reconciliation on a timeline conventional research firms cannot meet.

Approach

Bottom-up sizing of target sub-segments with revenue triangulated from SEC filings, private-company survey data, and independent benchmark estimates. Vendor positioning run through the proprietary moat-momentum matrix. Estimate variance disclosed as a dispersion band, not hidden as a point estimate.

Deliverables
  • ·30-chapter commissioned report (PDF + PPTX + Excel)
  • ·Vendor positioning matrix with named vendors
  • ·Revenue-pool decomposition with variance bands vs independent benchmarks
  • ·Committee-reviewed point estimate with dispersion disclosed
  • ·Optional follow-on coverage in adjacent verticals
What you walk away with

A committee-presentation baseline that holds up to red-team scrutiny, with the dispersion explained rather than buried.

02
Archetype 02 · Pre-close peer-estimate decomposition

Variance Reconciliation

Pre-close diligence in fragmented analyst markets

3–5 d
Variance memo + band
Duration
3–5 calendar days
Team
1 lead analyst · 1 sector specialist · committee sign-off
When it fits

A niche sub-segment where independent analyst benchmarks diverge widely, making the entry position impossible to defend without an independent reconciliation that explains the spread.

Approach

Systematic decomposition of each independent methodology, identification of the structural assumption gap, and a committee-reviewed point estimate with the full variance range preserved and explained. Nothing hidden in the footnotes.

Deliverables
  • ·Variance analysis memo with each peer benchmark decomposed
  • ·Committee-reviewed Meridian point estimate
  • ·Dispersion band with methodology attribution per estimate
  • ·Pricing-mismatch memo suitable for IC / LP materials
What you walk away with

A defensible point estimate with the full variance range explained, usable directly in investment-committee and LP materials.

03
Archetype 03 · Capacity map + multi-year demand model

Supply-Chain Cartography

Capacity-siting · policy-sensitive industries

10-yr
Forward horizon modelled
Duration
7–10 calendar days
Team
1 lead analyst · 1 supply-chain specialist · 1 policy reviewer · committee sign-off
When it fits

A capacity-siting or supply decision that requires upstream cartography, multi-year demand modelling, and policy-cycle sensitivity, where public estimates are stale or politicised.

Approach

Full capacity map across global facilities, raw-material flows traced through three upstream tiers, and a policy-cycle sensitivity model stress-tested against three scenarios. Sub-segment sensitivities run explicitly where adoption is moving faster than public estimates assume.

Deliverables
  • ·Capacity map across global facilities
  • ·Upstream raw-material flow analysis (3 tiers deep)
  • ·10-year demand model with three policy scenarios
  • ·Sub-segment sensitivity tables
  • ·Policy-arbitrage thesis memo
What you walk away with

A siting decision and a board-presentable thesis that survives three policy scenarios and explicit sub-segment sensitivities.

04
Archetype 04 · Quarterly thesis review + written support

Retained Advisory

Long-cycle commitments · standing diligence needs

Quarterly
Committee review cadence
Duration
12-month retainer (renewable)
Team
Senior Analyst of record · 1 sub-sector specialist · quarterly committee review
When it fits

A multi-year thesis or fund commitment that needs a standing research capability, not a one-off report, to diligence the underlying demand thesis, regional capacity constraints, and emerging risks across the holding period.

Approach

A bottom-up demand model layered with regional heat maps and constraint overlays, refreshed quarterly. Delivered under retainer with quarterly thesis reviews written as memos and full written-support coverage on every question that surfaces.

Deliverables
  • ·Bottom-up demand model with quarterly refresh
  • ·Regional heat maps with constraint overlays
  • ·Quarterly thesis review memos
  • ·Ongoing written research support through the retainer
  • ·Committee-reviewed commitment rationale memo
What you walk away with

A standing analyst team on call for committee questions, refreshed quarterly, with every memo committee-reviewed.

Reference engagements available under mutual NDA. Commission a study, or discuss your scenario with the analyst team.

Discuss an engagement
Advisory

Extensive Senior Analyst Support.

We are a research platform, not a document factory. Every commissioned study comes with an ongoing written relationship, unlimited questions, quarterly refreshes, and a dedicated research-support desk. Asynchronous by design, sourced by default.

Asynchronous
Written answers across time zones. No calendar tetris, no call-fatigue.
Citable
Every response sourced. Forwardable to committees. Archived, not ephemeral.
Team-wide
One inbox, searchable archive, every seat on your team sees the thread.
Included with every report

Q&A with the analyst

Every commissioned study includes unlimited written questions to the analyst who led the work. Ask for clarifications, stress-test the assumptions, request additional cuts of the data, each question gets a sourced, written response within one business day.

  • ·Unlimited written questions, no cap, no queue
  • ·Responses from the Senior Analyst who led the study
  • ·One-business-day turnaround, asynchronous
  • ·Every answer sourced and committee-reviewed
Included in every plan
Retained advisory

On-call research team

Dedicated research capacity for teams that need continuous market intelligence rather than one-off reports. A Senior Analyst of record, quarterly thesis reviews, and unlimited research requests within scope, accessed through the same written support channel.

  • ·Senior Analyst of record
  • ·Quarterly thesis review sessions, shared as written memos
  • ·Unlimited in-scope research requests
  • ·Priority queue for commissioned studies
Talk to the research team
Bespoke engagement

Commissioned deep-dive

Scoped studies outside the standard 30-chapter framework: investment-committee briefing papers, diligence support, white-label research for client advisory work. Every bespoke engagement carries the same written-support relationship as a standard report.

  • ·Scoped against your committee questions
  • ·Committee-reviewed before access
  • ·Evidence trail and red-team objections included
  • ·Extended written support through the engagement
Commission a study
Living research

Ongoing revisions & alerts

Your commissioned study refreshes on a quarterly cadence with event-triggered revisions whenever material developments enter the pipeline. Every revision ships with a written diff memo so you know exactly what changed and why.

  • ·Quarterly scheduled refresh
  • ·Event-triggered revisions, unlimited
  • ·Written diff memo on every refresh
  • ·Email alerts on material changes in coverage
See the refresh policy
Extensive support

Research support desk

A single inbox for every question across every report your team holds. Dedicated research operations support for exports, data-cut requests, citation verification, and methodology walkthroughs, written, archived, and searchable across your team.

  • ·One dedicated inbox, all reports
  • ·Citation & methodology verification
  • ·Custom data-cut requests within scope
  • ·Written archive of every conversation, shared across seats
Email the analyst team
Enterprise terms

Multi-seat & API access

Firm-wide licences, white-label PDF export with client-facing branding, and programmatic access to the structured research dataset behind every report. Includes the same written-support relationship extended to every seat.

  • ·Unlimited internal users
  • ·White-label export templates
  • ·API access to structured report data
  • ·Procurement terms & MSA on request
Request enterprise terms
Response SLA
< 1 day
Every written question, one business day
Queue
None
No waiting list, no tiered access
Archive
Searchable
Every thread saved, cross-team visible
Scope
Unlimited
Within the commissioned report boundary
On top of every report

Five new chapter add-ons. An always-on intel feed.

Layers are paid add-on chapters that bolt onto any report: patent landscape, M&A deal flow, pricing benchmark, channel map, talent landscape. Watchlists are a recurring intel feed on any industry you track. Both ship on the same evidence standards as the core report.

Attachable Layers · from $79 (free quota per plan)

Five depth modules that ship as additional chapters.

See all Layers

$79

Patent Landscape

IP map for the market: top assignees, citation density, white-space areas.

$79

Pricing Benchmark

Pricing-model classification, anchor price ranges, packaging tiers.

$79

M&A Layer

Public deal flow, 8-K filings, top acquirers, YoY trend.

$79

Talent & Hiring

Hiring posture, role mix, headcount, comp landscape, exec moves.

$79

Channel & Distribution

Channel model, direct-vs-indirect mix, partner ecosystem, concentration risks.

$99

ESG Watch

Basket-wide ESG signal: carbon disclosure posture, supply-chain risk, governance flags.

$99

Regulatory Radar

Cross-jurisdictional rulemaking timeline: what's filed, what's open for comment, what lands when.

$79

Demographic Drift

Buyer-base demographic shifts (age, income, geography, household formation) over the forecast horizon.

Free quota per plan: Single 1 · Pack 2 · Pack-10 3 · Unlimited all 5. Each Layer is a dedicated chapter generated post-finalize and refreshed alongside the parent on Living plans.

Intel Watchlists · with Senior Analyst Support

Track an industry. Never miss a deal, exec move, or filing.

See subscription tiers

Tracker

$89/mo

1 industry

Weekly digest

Strategist

$149/mo

3 industries

Daily alerts + Slack

Insider

$199/mo

Unlimited industries

Daily + immediate alerts

Every Layer purchase ships a 14-day Watchlist trialon the report's industry, no card needed for the trial window.

Model Context Protocol · v1.0

Built for the way buyers now research markets, through their AI assistant.

Install Meridian as an MCP server in Claude, Cursor, Claude Desktop, or any Model Context Protocol-compatible AI tool. Ask any market question in natural language; get a committee-reviewed answer with a Meridian citation back. No API key, no copy-paste from a 200-page PDF.

Listed on the official MCP Registry · 7 read-only tools · streamable HTTP

Install in Claude Code

claude mcp add meridian \
  https://www.meridianconsensus.com/api/mcp
Install in any AI client
How we work

Four commitments. No fine print.

Every report published under the Meridian Consensus masthead carries the same four commitments. These are not marketing claims, they are operational guarantees baked into the research pipeline.

Commitment

Every number sourced.

No claim in any Meridian report is unsourced. Where a figure comes from, institutional archive, proprietary dataset, peer research, or internal model, is recorded alongside the number itself. Clients can follow every thread back to evidence.

Commitment

Every estimate cross-validated.

Market-size estimates run through our proprietary ensemble and are explicitly compared against independent analyst benchmarks. Where we differ, we show it. Where we converge, we show that too. Readers see the dispersion, not a false point estimate.

Commitment

Every report committee-reviewed.

Before publication, every report passes through our research committee: adversarial review, plausibility testing, thesis sign-off. Critiques ship alongside the report, unedited. Clients read the objections, not just the conclusion.

Commitment

Every report alive.

Reports refresh on a quarterly cadence, with event-triggered revisions when material developments surface. Clients see what changed and why. Traditional research ships a static document stale on arrival; ours stays current.

The Meridian Consensus Digest

Weekly research digest.

A structured summary of the weekly published research, new commissioned studies, thesis revisions, and independent reconciliation updates. Published every Monday. Signed by the Meridian research team. No sales emails.

We respect your inbox. No tracking pixels, no forwarded sales pitches. The digest is free and will remain so.

Subscribed by teams at
Corporate development·Private equity·Management consulting·Strategy offices·Equity research
Commission your own research

Commission a market we haven't yet covered.

Same proprietary methodology as the coverage above. Accessible instantly on demand. From $799. See pricing →

Want to read one first? Open a specimen report Specialist (single-market) and Industry Overview (basket) shapes are both free to read end-to-end, no paywall.

Accessed as a 30-chapter commissioned study. Sign-in required · cross-validated against peer benchmarks · every figure sourced.

Common questions

Frequently asked questions.

The questions buyers ask most, with answers that do not dodge.

Every Meridian report passes through the proprietary five-stage research process and adversarial committee review before publication. Figures are reconstructed from at least three independent evidence classes; where uncertainty exists, the range is disclosed rather than collapsed into a false point estimate. Committee sign-off is required before any figure is published.

Any market, in any industry, in any geography, globally. Coverage is not a fixed catalogue. The representative verticals (healthcare, information & communications, semiconductors, energy & power, chemicals & materials, automotive, aerospace & defence, transport & logistics, industrial machinery, packaging, consumer goods, food & beverages, agriculture) are where commissioned studies are already in the library. Niche, emerging, and cross-border markets run against the same methodology; where public evidence is thin, the confidence band is disclosed rather than hidden.

Three things. First, every figure is traced to evidence, see the methodology for the five-stage research process. Second, estimates are explicitly compared against independent benchmarks; where we differ, we show it. Third, reports ship with committee objections included alongside the thesis, not edited out. Our research standards document the full process.

Four tiers. Single report is $799 one-time, one market, 30 chapters. Industry pack is $1,999 for five reports in one industry vertical. Industry pack 10 is $2,999 for ten reports in one vertical (best per-report price at ~$300). Industry unlimited is $8,999 for unlimited reports in one vertical, with five years of free updates and Senior Analyst Support included. All tiers include PDF + PPTX export and committee-reviewed refresh when material developments surface. See the full comparison on the pricing page.

Yes. Every report exports to PDF (print-ready, institutionally typeset), PPTX (board-deck ready), and Excel (structured data). Enterprise tiers on the pricing page receive API access to pull structured data directly into internal systems.

Reports are living documents. The research team refreshes coverage on a quarterly cadence, with event-triggered revisions when material developments enter the pipeline. Clients see what changed and why, every time. See the refresh cadence for details.

Available as a retained-advisory engagement. A Senior Analyst of record runs the relationship, with quarterly thesis reviews delivered as written memos and unlimited in-scope research requests answered through the same one-business-day written channel as commissioned reports. Standard scope covers a single market or vertical; multi-vertical and firm-wide retainers are scoped on a custom basis. Every memo is sourced and committee-reviewed, every refresh ships with a written diff, and the archive stays searchable across your team. Scope a retainer through the analyst team.

Read before you buy. Every Meridian report preview is free to read in full, the methodology and a complete specimen report are open, and you commission only after reading what defines the deliverable. Commissioned reports are final on delivery; the analyst team reviews factual or scope failures case-by-case under the preview-first policy.